Most ESL researchers proofread for spelling and grammar — and miss the errors that actually get papers rejected. This guide shows you what native-speaking reviewers actually notice, and how to catch it before they do.
Grammar tools like Grammarly catch surface-level mistakes. But academic reviewers — and especially native English speakers on editorial boards — notice something different: unnatural phrasing.
Unnatural phrasing is grammatically correct but sounds wrong to a native reader. It is the main reason papers from non-native English speakers receive comments like "the writing needs significant revision" with no specific feedback attached.
The good news: unnatural phrasing follows patterns. Once you know what to look for, you can fix it systematically.
Do not try to fix everything in a single read. Each pass has one job.
Read only the first sentence of each paragraph. Does each have a clear topic sentence? Does the sequence make logical sense? Fix structural gaps before touching the language.
Look for over-hedging ("might possibly suggest…") and under-hedging ("this proves"). One hedge per claim is enough. Unsupported absolute claims are a red flag for reviewers.
Turn noun-heavy phrases back into verbs: "conduct an investigation" → "investigate", "give consideration to" → "consider". Too many nominalizations make text dense and hard to follow.
Passive voice is expected in academic writing — but not everywhere. If more than 40% of your sentences are passive, the text will feel impersonal. Active voice is preferred when the agent matters.
This is the hardest aspect for speakers of Turkish, Arabic, Chinese, and Korean. Ask for every noun: "Is this specific or general? First mention or previously established?" Your ear will often catch it if you read aloud.
The Academic Word List covers ~570 word families common in academic texts. Low AWL density signals informal writing. Compare: "The study looked at stress" vs. "The study examined the impact of stress."
Read your paper out loud — not silently. Your brain silently reads what you meant to write, not what you actually wrote. Reading aloud forces you to process the actual words on the page, and awkward sentences become immediately obvious.
A practical rule: if a sentence is too long to say in one breath, it needs a period somewhere in the middle.
Writademic tip: Writademic analyzes your writing across 11 style dimensions — passive voice ratio, hedging balance, nominalization density, AWL coverage, and more — and shows you exactly where your text deviates from academic norms. Corrections are suggested in your own writing style, so revisions feel natural rather than foreign.
For a journal article: at minimum 3 passes on different days. Fresh eyes catch errors that familiarity hides. Leave at least 24 hours between your final pass and submission.
For a conference abstract or short paper: 2 passes is usually sufficient. Use the checklist above as a fast-track substitute for the full 6-pass method.
Upload your text and get a detailed analysis of hedging, passive voice, nominalization, AWL vocabulary, and more — all calibrated to your personal writing style.
Try Writademic Free →Free plan · No credit card required · 3 credits on signup